Electric Power

realcleverscience:

usagov:

This October is Energy Awareness Month, and it is a good time to go over your energy routine and think of ways to conserve energy in your home and daily life…

Pay attention to the energy use in your home so you can monitor how much you are using. Simply unplugging some large energy consumers when they are not in use, such as home entertainment systems, and turning off lights when you leave a room, can save you money on your utility bill each month

Learn more about energy awareness and how to save.

Comments (View)


poptech:

Paul Needham is interested in why and how people buy things. As a doctoral student at Cambridge, he specialized in a field of economics that asked questions like “What does it cost a buyer to find a seller?” Does the buyer have to travel a great distance, for instance? Does she have to pay a fee to a middle man? So when he started thinking about energy access—how to improve the way people in places without strong electricity infrastructure get their power—one of the questions he asked himself was “Why don’t I own solar panels?” 

GOOD profiles 2011 Social Innovation Fellow Paul Needham who founded Simpa Networks, which sells high quality solar energy systems on a pay-as-you-go basis to underserved people in emerging markets.


Comments (View)


smarterplanet:

Is Thorium the Biggest Energy Breakthrough Since Fire? Possibly. - Forbes
For the past several months, a friend of mine has been telling me  about the potentially game-changing implications of an obscure (at least  to me) metal named Thorium after the Norse god of thunder, Thor.
It seems he is not the only person who believes thorium, a  naturally-occurring, slightly radioactive metal discovered in 1828 by  the Swedish chemist Jons Jakob Berzelius, could provide the world with  an ultra-safe, ultra-cheap source of nuclear power.
Last week, scores of thorium boosters gathered in the United Kingdom to launch a new advocacy organizing, the Weinberg Foundation,  which plans to push the promise of thorium nuclear energy into the  mainstream political discussion of clean energy and climate change. The  message they’re sending is that thorium is the anti-dote to the world’s  most pressing energy and environmental challenges.
So what is the big deal about thorium?  In 2006, writing in the magazine Cosmos, Tim Dean summarized perhaps the most optimistic scenario for what a Thorium-powered nuclear world would be like:
 

What  if we could build a nuclear reactor that offered no possibility of a  meltdown, generated its power inexpensively, created no weapons-grade  by-products, and burnt up existing high-level waste as well as old  nuclear weapon stockpiles? And what if the waste produced by such a  reactor was radioactive for a mere few hundred years rather than tens of  thousands? It may sound too good to be true, but such a reactor is  indeed possible, and a number of teams around the world are now working  to make it a reality. What makes this incredible reactor so different is  its fuel source: thorium.

smarterplanet:

Is Thorium the Biggest Energy Breakthrough Since Fire? Possibly. - Forbes

For the past several months, a friend of mine has been telling me about the potentially game-changing implications of an obscure (at least to me) metal named Thorium after the Norse god of thunder, Thor.

It seems he is not the only person who believes thorium, a naturally-occurring, slightly radioactive metal discovered in 1828 by the Swedish chemist Jons Jakob Berzelius, could provide the world with an ultra-safe, ultra-cheap source of nuclear power.

Last week, scores of thorium boosters gathered in the United Kingdom to launch a new advocacy organizing, the Weinberg Foundation, which plans to push the promise of thorium nuclear energy into the mainstream political discussion of clean energy and climate change. The message they’re sending is that thorium is the anti-dote to the world’s most pressing energy and environmental challenges.

So what is the big deal about thorium? In 2006, writing in the magazine Cosmos, Tim Dean summarized perhaps the most optimistic scenario for what a Thorium-powered nuclear world would be like:

 

What if we could build a nuclear reactor that offered no possibility of a meltdown, generated its power inexpensively, created no weapons-grade by-products, and burnt up existing high-level waste as well as old nuclear weapon stockpiles? And what if the waste produced by such a reactor was radioactive for a mere few hundred years rather than tens of thousands? It may sound too good to be true, but such a reactor is indeed possible, and a number of teams around the world are now working to make it a reality. What makes this incredible reactor so different is its fuel source: thorium.


Comments (View)