Electric Power
Super High Speed Trains Might Be A Part Of Your Future Holiday Travel Plans
[…]The Obama Administration has pledged to make as much as $13 billion  worth of stimulus money available for high speed rail projects, with an  aim to bring the US rail system up to par with those in Europe and Asia.  Although Amtrak, the US’s intercity passenger rail provider, served a  record 28.7 million people last year, this number is disproportionately  low when compared to other countries, and part of that is how slow most  trains are, and how infrequently they run.
This is partially a structural problem - most tracks were never  upgraded to meet 1940’s-era Federal Railroad Administration standards  due to cost concerns, which keeps trains outside the Northeast Corridor  operating at under 79 miles per hour. Lowering average speeds still  further is the fact that passenger trains are often forced to idle on  the tracks for up to an hour while freight traffic is given higher  priority and allowed to go ahead.
Since World War II, most of the US’s  investments in transportation have focused on planes and automobiles,  while Europe and Asia have placed their emphasis on trains, which is a  big reason for the current disparity. Jalopnik’s Sam Smith argued  earlier this month for the  necessity of high speed trains in the US, and it appears the current  administration agrees. President Obama has proposed the creation of “an  efficient, high-speed passenger rail network of 100- to 600-mile  intercity corridors that connect communities across America.” The  obvious American model for such a service is the Northeast Corridor’s  Acela Express, which runs daily between Boston and Washington, DC.
The only high speed train in the United States, the Acela still lags  behind its counterparts elsewhere in the world; its maximum speed is  only 150 miles per hour and it averages only about half that speed. By  contrast, the French TGV averages about 175 miles per hour, and  it tops out at a record 357.1 miles per hour. Indeed, even the 13  billion dollars the Obama Administration has pledged is dwarfed by the  investments of other countries; the Chinese have already said they will  put over 300 billion dollars into expanding their high speed rail  network.[…]
io9

Super High Speed Trains Might Be A Part Of Your Future Holiday Travel Plans

[…]The Obama Administration has pledged to make as much as $13 billion worth of stimulus money available for high speed rail projects, with an aim to bring the US rail system up to par with those in Europe and Asia. Although Amtrak, the US’s intercity passenger rail provider, served a record 28.7 million people last year, this number is disproportionately low when compared to other countries, and part of that is how slow most trains are, and how infrequently they run.

This is partially a structural problem - most tracks were never upgraded to meet 1940’s-era Federal Railroad Administration standards due to cost concerns, which keeps trains outside the Northeast Corridor operating at under 79 miles per hour. Lowering average speeds still further is the fact that passenger trains are often forced to idle on the tracks for up to an hour while freight traffic is given higher priority and allowed to go ahead.

Since World War II, most of the US’s investments in transportation have focused on planes and automobiles, while Europe and Asia have placed their emphasis on trains, which is a big reason for the current disparity. Jalopnik’s Sam Smith argued earlier this month for the necessity of high speed trains in the US, and it appears the current administration agrees. President Obama has proposed the creation of “an efficient, high-speed passenger rail network of 100- to 600-mile intercity corridors that connect communities across America.” The obvious American model for such a service is the Northeast Corridor’s Acela Express, which runs daily between Boston and Washington, DC.

The only high speed train in the United States, the Acela still lags behind its counterparts elsewhere in the world; its maximum speed is only 150 miles per hour and it averages only about half that speed. By contrast, the French TGV averages about 175 miles per hour, and it tops out at a record 357.1 miles per hour. Indeed, even the 13 billion dollars the Obama Administration has pledged is dwarfed by the investments of other countries; the Chinese have already said they will put over 300 billion dollars into expanding their high speed rail network.[…]

io9


Comments (View)


blog comments powered by Disqus